International Litigation and Commerce – from an ISRAELI Perspective
ליטיגציה בינלאומית וסחר בינלאומי – מנקודת מבט ישראלית
Blog of 
© Sherby & Co., Advs.
© אריק שרבי בספר הנקרה International Aspects of U.S. Litigation , שהוצא לאור ע”י לשכת עורכי הדין האמריקאית (ה-American Bar Association), ערכתי שני פרקים, שאחד מהם עוסק באכיפת תניות פורום בהסכמים מסחריים בינלאומיים. בהסבירי את ההבדל בין “הסכמה” לסמכות שיפוט (consent to jurisdiction) לבין תניית ברירת פורום (forum selection clause), כתבתי בשנת 2015
© Sherby & Co., Advs.
© 2025 Eric S. Sherby The fifth annual Tel Aviv Arbitration Week took place in late October, and the organizers should be saluted for having put together a quality networking event, featuring top-notch speakers. At any such conference, it is common for the different speakers to address various sub-issues within the field of international dispute
© Sherby & Co., Advs.
As the second anniversary of Israel’s adopting the UNCITRAL Model Arbitration Law (the “New Law”) approaches, it is reasonable to ask: to what extent has the New Law had an effect on the decision by business people to resolve disputes in Israel through arbitration? Of course, Israel has been
© Sherby & Co., Advs.
© 2025 Eric S. Sherby Over the past two weeks, a great deal has been published concerning a decision in late August, by the Tel Aviv District Court, denying enforcement of an arbitral award given by a Paris-based panel under the auspices of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) under the Convention
© Sherby & Co., Advs.
Since January 11, 2024, our firm has published a series of analyses regarding specific aspects Israel’s new statute (in Hebrew, חוק הבוררות המסחרית הבין-לאומית, תשפ”ד 2024), which adopted the Model Law of the United Nations International Trade Commission (commonly known as the “UNCITRAL Model Law”) for international arbitrations taking
© Sherby & Co., Advs.
As reported in our post of January 11, Israel’s Knesset is considering adopting, for international arbitrations taking place in Israel, the Model Law of the United Nations International Trade Commission (commonly known as the “UNCITRAL Model Law”). In the first two parts of this series, we examined the circumstances
© Sherby & Co., Advs.
© 2023 The text below was published as an Op-Ed on February 22, 2023, by The Jerusalem Post, https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-732304 Because the Post’s online version was a bit different from the print version, we reprint below the text as it was provided to the Post. Capital Punishment For Terrorists – Theoretically Defensible But Not Wise © 2023 Eric S.
© Sherby & Co., Advs.
© 2022 שרבי ושות’, עו”ד לא בכל שבוע נושא יישוב הסכסוכים בהודו תופס את תשומת לבם של הישראלים, אבל השבוע שעבר בהחלט היה שבוע כזה. חברת שרין טכנולוגיות בע”מ, הנסחרת בבורסה לניירות ערך בתל אביב (ובסינגפור), הודיעה כי בית משפט הודי פסק לטובתה ונגד השימוש הבלתי חוקי בתוכנה שלה ולמעשה הוציא צו מניעה נגד
© Sherby & Co., Advs.
This week the governments of the United States, Israel, and Lebanon announced that they had reached an agreement concerning drilling and related activities in the territorial waters of Israel and Lebanon (the “Border Arrangement”). This blog post addresses various issues arising under the very lean dispute resolution provision of the Border Arrangement. So far, the
© Sherby & Co., Advs.
© 2022 Eric S. Sherby A mere two hours after our firm uploaded to this blog (on June 13) a piece on section 1782 discovery (28 U.S.C. § 1782), the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in the consolidated cases of ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd. and AlixPartners, LLP, et al. v.